Haste Makes Litigation Waste: Poor Drafting Renders Option to Purchase Unenforceable, guest post by Justin Daniels

Blackberries, text messaging and instant messaging have resulted in a culture that worships speed at the expense of precision. I see this effect every day when people explain transactions to me that they wish to pursue only to leave out important details that they either had not considered or were in their head and did not make it into the email.

I recently encountered a court case the demonstrates this principle and its disastrous consequences. A landlord and tenant quickly entered into a lease where the tenant was leasing “premises” defined as approximately half the available office space. The parties further agreed that the tenant would have the right to purchase the property. The parties, however, in their haste, failed to define what property meant. The tenant later exercised its right to purchase the property, however, the landlord refused to honor the option. The parties predictably ended up in litigation over the word property.

Definitions of Property and Premises are not Identical

After both parties expended significant sums in legal fees, the court of appeals determined that the lease defined premises but the option to purchase was for the property. The term property, however, was not defined anywhere in the lease. The court concluded that the option failed and was not enforceable because it did not define the property subject to the purchase option.

Haste makes litigation waste. A competent commercial real estate attorney can save you thousands of dollars in litigation fees by properly drafting this lease by defining premises and separately defining the property by attaching the legal description of the property to the lease. You may also not be aware that it’s a good idea to file a memorandum of the lease in the county real estate records so any third party who wishes to purchase the property will have notice of the purchase option. Many people, unfortunately, belatedly realize the value of a good commercial real estate attorney only after feeling the pain of five or six figure litigation costs. Avoid these costly mistakes by employing a seasoned commercial real estate attorney.

As always your trusted resource for practical legal advice.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Related posts:

  1. Commercial Lease Legal Issues Checklist, guest post by Justin Daniels
  2. Cumulative CAM Cap and Your Commercial Lease, guest post by Justin Daniels
  3. Your Contract is Your Bond – guest post by Justin Daniels, Atlanta Real Estate Attorney

Tags: , , , ,

  • Seesmic video reply from Disqus.
  • Seesmic video reply from Disqus.
  • Real Estate Agents in my humble opinion (I am one) should leave legal work to the legal professional. Not that a good agent shouldn't be fairly cognizant of contract issues that a client might face, I just think their time is better spent on their job specific tasks in terms of opinions of value, negotiations, and marketing. A good agent should certainly weigh in when it comes to how the terms of a contract will play out in the negotiation. However, a good agent should be spending his or her time studying his craft not trying to perfect others (ie. surveying, title work, zoning, structural engineer, architectural work)
  • One must never run into decisions without thinking over them properly. A commercial agent can surely help solving the problem.
  • While an attorney would have been a great addition to that hasty lease drafting session - a seasoned commercial agent would have put the legal description into that contract.

    Without sufficient property legal description, contracts of sale lack enforceability - as the litigants you described above have discovered... thus proving the old adage "a person who represents himself has a fool for a client".
  • I couldn't agree more with Doug. A seasoned commercial agent can make a big difference in getting the deal done right. Attorney's are also helpful when drafting complex agreements or adding special stipulations to an agreement.
  • Justin

    Glad to see I stimulated some discussion.

    Agents need to continually be careful when drafting contract language. I see too many times where assumptions the parties understood do not make it into the agreement. Later when there is a problem both parties are unclear on those assumptions or have a foggy memory because it now suits their purposes to say they meant something else.
blog comments powered by Disqus